After playing the Bulls closely for 2 games, the Indiana Pacers almost seem relevant. Is this something they can build off of or are they just catching the Bulls in a slump? A look back shows that the Bulls haven’t had convincing blowout wins against bad teams. Regardless, the Pacers’ play has been focused, outside of the last 3 minutes of each game.
Hold on though, are we just going to ignore that Indiana finished the season with 8 more losses than wins? How about the fact that their leading scorer, Danny Granger, shoots a measly 42.5%. The best case scenario for next season is sneaking up to a sixth seed and then losing in 6. Admittedly I don’t ever watch Pacers games, and it seems like they do have some nice pieces in Granger, Collison, and Hibbert. But why are they 37-45 in the East then?
No comments:
Post a Comment